Fordjour, G A; Chan, A P C and Tuffour-Kwarteng, L (2021) Exploring construction employees’ perspectives on the potential causes of psychological health conditions in the construction industry: A study in Ghana. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 17(4), pp. 373-393. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Psychological ill-health conditions have become prominent among construction employees. This study aims to identify construction work-related factors that are likely to expose construction employees to psychological ill-health conditions. To achieve this aim mixed-methods approach was adopted, with the methods of qualitative focus group study first employed to derive unique findings from the experiences, perceptions, and opinions of the research participants. A 42-inventory scale on construction work-related psychological risk factors was developed from the 16 focus group discussions held in Ghana. A comparative survey with 300 construction professionals and construction trade workers was then conducted in Ghana to confirm the findings from the qualitative study and to determine the critical risk factors. The most critical factors ranked by the construction professionals and construction trade workers were tight deadline pressures, and abusive/over-demanding supervision, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis employed revealed seven constructs of the 42 construction work-related risk factors, namely: high task demands, high role demands, poor relationships, poor work conditions, lack of autonomy, lack of feedback, and unfair treatments. Further analysis also revealed a positive correlation between all the factors and psychological health indicators. This study provides valuable insight into the development of preventive psychological health interventions for the construction industry globally.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction employees; construction industry; occupational psychology; psychological risk-factors; work factors |
| Index terms: | construction professional, risk factor, occupational psychology, construction work, construction industry, supervision, inventory, construction employee, qualitative study, Ghana, critical factor, psychological health, exploratory factor analysis, focus group, survey |
| Subjects: | inventory management, Geography, environmental hazards, practitioner, psychology, operations management, professional development, industry analysis, statistical analysis, health conditions and diseases, control systems, risk assessment, data collection methods, research design and methodology |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Risk Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Supply Chain Management, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here