Aghimien, D; Aigbavboa, C; Oke, A and Aghimien, L (2022) Latent institutional environment factors influencing construction digitalization in South Africa. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 18(2), pp. 142-158. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
This paper presents the findings of an assessment of the latent institutional environment factors influencing construction digitalization using South Africa as a point of reference. The study employed a post-positivism philosophical stance which informed the use of a quantitative survey approach. The survey was conducted among construction professionals actively involved in construction projects across the country. Analysis of the data gathered was done using mean item score, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM). EFA revealed two principal external environment factors (legislation and regulation, and pressure from clients and competitors) that can influence construction digitalization. Further to this, SEM revealed that while the pressure from client and competitors will have a more significant influence on digitalization, the pressure from industry regulations and government legislation cannot be overlooked. The findings of the study can be used as a guide toward the digitalization of construction organizations through the consciousness of the influence of external environmental issues, an aspect that has not gained significant recognition in the construction digitalization discourse.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; digitalization; fourth industrial revolution; institutional environment; institutional theory |
| Index terms: | construction project, positivism, regulation, South Africa, environmental issue, legislation, exploratory factor analysis, digitalization, structural equation modelling, survey, construction professional, fourth industrial revolution, consciousness, construction organization, institutional theory |
| Subjects: | human factors and perception, environmental issues, organization, legal systems, digital technology, Geography, production management, data collection methods, technology adoption, professional development, statistical analysis, political science, philosophical concept, sociology |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Governance, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Project Management, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here