Barriers to mentoring of graduates in quantity surveying firms in Tanzania: A factor analysis approach

Sospeter, N G; Kikwasi, G J and Chileshe, N (2022) Barriers to mentoring of graduates in quantity surveying firms in Tanzania: A factor analysis approach. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 18(4), pp. 295-314. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

Despite the plethora of studies on barriers to mentoring, these have focused more on the higher education sector, and particularly mentoring to university graduates. However, there still limited studies that have focused on understanding the barriers affecting the mentoring process of graduates in quantity surveying firms within developing countries. This research aims at bridging that knowledge gap by exploring the underlying relationships among the barriers to mentoring of graduates in the context of quantity surveying firms in Tanzania thus minimizing risk of losing vital knowledge and competencies. An interpretivist epistemological design was adapted to extensively manually review and search the literature on mentoring barriers. Based on 15 barriers to mentoring identified, a questionnaire survey was used to collect data from graduates employed in Tanzanian quantity surveying firms, with 53 validated responses; mean score techniques and factor analysis were conducted. Empirical results showed a four-factor model comprising the following: multicultural and social injustice-related barriers; mentoring relationship-related barriers; personal and relational behavior-related barriers; and attitudinal and knowledge-related barriers. The identification of the key barriers to mentoring of graduates would be useful to advocate informal mentoring training programs to sharpen the skills of mentors in order to improve the performance of graduates.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: factor analysis; graduates; mentoring; quantity surveying; Tanzania
Index terms: Tanzania, higher education, factor analysis, surveying, developing country, quantity surveying firm, survey, questionnaire, program, mentors, mentoring
Subjects: Geography, development economics, practitioner, training, software systems, statistical analysis, educational institutions, profession, data collection methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics
Topics: Education, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Digital Applications, Human Resources, International Construction, Research Practice, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here