Redden, L and Bugg, R A (2022) Efficacy and benefits of a required service-learning course in construction management education. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 18(4), pp. 315-332. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
A trend for universities in the United States to embrace high-impact educational practices in curricula to enrich student learning experience has emerged over the last couple decades. During a curriculum revision in 2017, the faculty at Auburn University made the decision to add a stand-alone, service-learning course as a requirement for graduation. The service-learning course is centered on a construction project that serves the community and incorporates the application of various critical facets of construction management: engagement and communication with all stakeholders, planning, estimating, scheduling, and constructing the project. The research focused on perceptions of the execution and efficacy of the course from two primary stakeholder groups: students and clients. The results show the students increased their interpersonal engagement, management skills, civic responsibility, and understanding of diverse needs by the end of the semester. While clients and students noted major challenges in logistics, project planning, and scheduling, the results illustrate the effort to deliver this high-impact educational experience for the students was worthwhile and had a beneficial effect in the engaged communities. Dissemination of the results may be useful in starting a stand-alone long-term construction management service-learning course at other institutions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | community engagement; construction education; high-impact educational practices; service-learning; student learning |
| Index terms: | construction management education, management service, construction project, construction education, learning experience, dissemination, community engagement, United States, scheduling, estimating, project planning |
| Subjects: | Geography, production management, knowledge translation, professional education, community and social dimensions, professional development, operations research, learning methods, control systems, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Time Control, Geographical Context, Information Management, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here