Employee reactions to adoption of alternative project delivery methods within the AEC industry

Aldossari, K M; Lines, B C; Smithwick, J B; Hurtado, K C and Sullivan, K T (2023) Employee reactions to adoption of alternative project delivery methods within the AEC industry. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 19(1), pp. 4-21. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

The implementation of alternative project delivery methods (APDMs) in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry has increased in recent years. Yet implementation of these methods requires an organizational change effort. One of the challenges facing organizations that are implementing organizational change initiatives is employee resistance to change. The aim of this study was to investigate AEC employees’ reactions to the adoption of APDMs and to examine the methods used to communicate the APDM adoption to employees. To achieve the aim, survey responses were collected from 140 respondents across AEC owner organizations in the United States. Results indicate that employees in AEC owner organizations react favorably to adopting a change in their project delivery systems. Results further reveal that increasing the use of organizational change management (OCM) practices is related to decreased employee resistance to change. Surprisingly, employee reactions do not mediate the relationship between OCM practices and APDM adoption. The findings also indicate that the most effective ways to disseminate change messages to employees are presentations, on-the-job support, and meetings. The findings of this study may be useful for change practitioners in which employees’ reactions toward the changes in project delivery methods are more supportive than resistive to change.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: AEC industry; alternative project methods; employee reactions; organizational change; resistance to change
Index terms: organizational change, United States, survey, practitioner, job support, owner, implementation, project delivery
Subjects: sociology, management, project delivery, business, data collection methods, Geography, contractual arrangements, practitioner
Topics: Geographical Context, Procurement, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Human Resources, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here