Alternative project delivery method adoption in the AEC industry: An organizational change perspective

Aldossari, K M; Lines, B C; Smithwick, J B; Hurtado, K C and Sullivan, K T (2023) Alternative project delivery method adoption in the AEC industry: An organizational change perspective. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 19(2), pp. 150-165. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

In the last two decades, an increasing number of organizations have shifted from using the design-bid-build delivery method (DBB) to alternative project delivery methods (APDMs). This shift requires changes for both the organizations and the individuals involved. This study provides guidelines detailing how to lead APDM adoption at the organizational level through using a change management perspective. The guidelines were developed based on analyzing the results of semi-structured interviews with nine individuals. The participants were industry professionals who were selected because their organizations had successfully adopted APDMs. The findings from the interviews indicate that the best opportunity to implement APDMs successfully is available through using four phases. The phases are preparing and planning, pilot project testing the project, expanding to the intended scale and sustaining and evaluating. The phases include specific organizational change management (OCM) practices that increase the probability of successful APDM adoption. This study contributes to organizational change in the AEC industry by explaining how OCM practices are used to implement APDMs successfully. This study also contributes to the existing body of knowledge by providing guidelines that can help public owner organizations as they consider adopting APDMs for the first time.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: AEC industry; alternative project delivery method; organizational change
Index terms: change management, design-bid-build, interview, public owner, delivery method, project delivery, testing, organizational change, body of knowledge
Subjects: delivery method, management, project delivery, professional practice, business, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, knowledge management, sociology
Topics: Research Practice, Organizational Design, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here