Obstacles and solutions to implementing job hazard analysis in construction: A case study

Memarian, B; Brooks, S B and Le, J C (2023) Obstacles and solutions to implementing job hazard analysis in construction: A case study. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 19(2), pp. 187-198. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

Construction workers experience a disproportionately high rate of work-related injuries. However, if hazards are properly recognized and addressed, most of these incidents are preventable. Job hazard analysis (JHA) is a method for identifying and mitigating workplace hazards that emphasizes proactive risk control. Despite its importance, the construction industry currently lacks comprehensive guidelines on how to effectively design and implement JHA on a consistent basis. To fill this gap, this case study pursued two objectives: (1) to explore challenges and shortcomings of current practices in developing and implementing JHA in construction and (2) to identify effective practices and interventions employed by contractors to address these challenges. To this end, 30 sample JHA documents were analyzed, and 23 semi-structured interviews were conducted with construction safety professionals representing 17 companies. Findings of this study identified a lack of worker involvement in the process, lack of buy-in, management absence, complacency, and inadequate coordination and communication as major issues. Solutions explored to address these challenges included incorporating visual aids, rotating JHA meeting leaders, and continuously updating JHA information to reflect the current work conditions. The practical implications of these findings and the path forward for further research are discussed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction safety; jha; job hazard analysis; job safety analysis; pre-task planning
Index terms: injury, interview, documents, construction safety, case study, coordination, construction industry, construction worker
Subjects: practitioner, professional development, management, industry analysis, environmental health, health conditions and diseases, data collection methods
Topics: Organizational Design, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Sustainability, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here