Simons, A E; Redden, L and Collins, W (2023) Sitework knowledge for entry-level construction professionals: Academic and industry perceptions. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 19(2), pp. 199-220. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Sitework is an essential scope of many building construction projects. The level of cognition related to sitework that a construction management undergraduate should achieve prior to entering the construction industry has not been researched. This paper describes a study analyzing both academics’ and industry practitioners’ perceptions of what construction management students should know about sitework by the time they graduate, both in terms of the topics explored and the level of knowledge they have attained. Surveys measured the level at which specific sitework topics should be incorporated into construction management programs. Responses collected from 60 industry practitioners and 35 faculty from construction management programs were analyzed. Results show that practitioner respondents generally expect graduates to exit their programs at lower levels of cognition, while academics expect graduates should achieve higher levels of cognition. A statistically significant difference exists between academics and practitioners regarding several estimating topics, as well as safety, site logistics, existing technologies, and unforeseen site conditions. Recommendations from the study regarding the level of cognition for each topic area are provided to offer the opportunity for programs to evaluate and adjust their content coverage and to suggest that further studies may be warranted based on industry perceptions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bloom’s taxonomy; construction education; earthwork; sitework |
| Index terms: | taxonomy, construction industry, undergraduate, construction professional, building construction, survey, earthwork, site logistics, estimating, construction education, cognition, program, practitioner |
| Subjects: | software systems, professional development, industry analysis, data collection methods, financial and cost management, data analysis and analytics, professional education, building construction, cognitive psychology, practitioner, operations management, construction methods, curriculum development |
| Topics: | Education, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Digital Applications, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here