Holt, E A; Perrenoud, A; Perkins, E and Bigelow, B F (2023) Recommendations for recruiting and developing early career membership in construction associations. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 19(3), pp. 242-258. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Associations in all types of industries are required to rethink and reshape their recruitment efforts to engage the next generation of early-career professionals. Many of the things that previously attracted members don’t seem to work. This study looked at builders’ associations and how they can improve their current strategies and offerings to attract Young Professionals or those moving through the various early stages of their careers. The objective of the Delphi study conducted was to come to an expert consensus on recommendations for associations to increase membership. The results indicate associations must enhance education and exposure to young people about the industry, provide more mentorship opportunities, and encourage young people’s involvement in leadership positions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | association; construction; Delphi; early career professionals; recruitment |
| Index terms: | Delphi method, recruitment, strategy, builder, career, exposure |
| Subjects: | practitioner, professional development, management, public and environmental health, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here