Leading UK construction companies’ strategies to tackle BIM training and skills challenges

Shojaei, R S; Oti-Sarpong, K and Burgess, G (2023) Leading UK construction companies’ strategies to tackle BIM training and skills challenges. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 19(4), pp. 383-404. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

Widespread adoption of Building Information Modeling (BIM) is firmly on policy agenda in several countries. Despite emphasis on governments’ ambitions for industry-wide BIM adoption, there is scant understanding about what construction firms need to do regarding training provision and how to do that to meet policy goals. There is, therefore, little evidence of how construction companies have tackled this challenge internally and on projects in existing studies. Through a qualitative research approach and case studies of two leading UK construction companies, this paper describes the different strategies that construction companies adopt to provide the requisite skills and training for their workforce and their project supplier network partners to successfully support and sustain the implementation of BIM. The findings show that successful main contractors employed an “in-house” training strategy at intra-organizational level and a “growing together” approach for their project supplier network partners. In providing BIM training, these firms tackled problems of heterogeneity in workforce digital literacy and competencies, a lack of attention to soft skills, and a lack of understanding of BIM benefits using tailored and role-specific training. These insights contribute to the growing literature on BIM training, complementing the existing literature that focuses mainly on BIM training through education.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: AEC industry; building information modeling; construction companies; skill; training
Index terms: construction firm, construction company, strategy, evidence, qualitative research, case study, building information modelling, main contractor, implementation
Subjects: management, information systems, data collection methods, research design and methodology, practitioner, evaluation and assessment methods, organization, contractual arrangements
Topics: Procurement, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here