Siva, J; Gajendran, T; Toinpre, O and Vaughan, J (2025) Driving the zero-carbon construction strategy: Key barriers and enablers. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 15(3), pp. 380-398. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose: In the fast-changing field of zero-carbon construction there is a gap in understanding how zero-carbon construction strategies are experienced in practice. This paper aims to identify the key barriers and enablers to driving a zero-carbon construction strategy by industry, policymakers and educators. Design/methodology/approach: The research was conducted in two stages. The first stage used a literature review to determine thematic areas from which to develop discussion points for the second stage of the research, which gathered insights into key barriers and enablers to driving a zero-carbon construction strategy from analysing recorded discussion with industry, policymakers and educators. This study adopts a qualitative research methodological design underpinned by dialectical approach of enquiries involving 31 participants. The philosophical standpoint aligns with a constructivist participatory worldview based on multiple stakeholder perspectives. Data involving virtual and face-to-face engagement held simultaneously in Australia and India were transcribed, coded and synthesised to identify the barriers and enablers to driving zero-carbon construction strategy. Findings: The paper identified key barriers and enablers driving zero-carbon construction strategy. Barriers included limited awareness of industry dynamics; fixed mental models of professional practice; complexities in identifying appropriate skillsets; difficulties associated with reviewing education and training models and integrating sustainable strategies at early stages of projects. Enablers included: fostering education reform and supporting frameworks and procurement strategies for developers and clients; implementing efficient building designs, construction and operationalisation of zero-carbon buildings and; utilising an industry-led integrated approach. A framework was developed to provide an illustrative view of the linkage between the research projects’ focus areas and emergent themes. Originality/value: The paper provides zero-carbon action priorities for four significant stakeholder groups in the build environment, developers, building occupiers, educators and government. As the priorities are derived in the research from examination of current literature and analysis of stakeholder viewpoints, this paper presents a unique, realistic and timely identification of barriers and key enablers driving zero-carbon construction strategies. Methodology applied in terms of data collection involved a public discourse and a unique technology-driven collaborative approach where participants simultaneously contributed across countries and time zones in a synchronous manner across key topics related to driving the zero-carbon construction strategy.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | barriers; education; enablers; energy efficiency; environmental education; innovation; net-zero emissions; sustainable buildings; zero-carbon construction |
| Index terms: | dynamics, India, education and training, environmental education, energy efficiency, building design, linkage, mental model, Australia, procurement strategy, methodology, qualitative research, sustainable building, complexity, professional practice, integrated approach, literature review, face, strategy |
| Subjects: | research methods, Geography, sustainable construction, professional education, cognitive psychology, psychology, contractual arrangements, architectural design, management, professional development, systems engineering, business, research design and methodology, environmental behaviour, sustainability and energy, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Sustainability, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here