Choudhary, K; Gill, G; Sangwa, N R and Sarna, B (2025) Utilising copper tailings as a sustainable alternative to conventional structural filling materials: LCA analysis. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 15(3), pp. 415-431. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose: Mine tailings are solid waste left after extracting the valuable fraction of the ore. This study reviewed the possibility of using copper-tailing waste to develop building foundations and compared its environmental implications with conventional sand foundations. Design/methodology/approach: This study first discusses the state-of-the-art use of copper tailings in various industries through a literature review. The study then uses the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to quantify and compare the environmental impacts generated by the conventional sand and tailing foundations for buildings by considering a 1 × 1 m foundation area. The study also assessed the environmental impacts of a real copper mine case of the Khetri Copper Complex in the state of Rajasthan, India, and conducted a sensitivity analysis to show the impact of transportation distance on environmental impacts using the Monte Carlo simulation technique. Findings: The study results indicate that the building foundation developed using copper-tailing waste is environmentally beneficial compared to a sand foundation. The sensitivity analysis results indicate that the transportation of tailings reduces the environmental benefits if transported over long distances; however, the utilisation is helpful for environmental sustainability. We further discussed the managerial and social implications of the results. Originality/value: This study is a novel contribution highlighting the sequestration potential of copper tailing waste utilisation using midpoint and endpoint environmental impact categories.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | carbon sequestration; climate change; copper mine; life cycle assessment; mine tailings; Monte Carlo simulation |
| Index terms: | sand, foundations, India, copper, Monte Carlo simulation, environmental sustainability, climate change, state of the art, environmental impact, methodology, tailings, life cycle assessment, literature review, sensitivity analysis, sequestration |
| Subjects: | structural engineering, research methods, Geography, health safety and environment, environmental hazards, research dissemination and communication, environmental impact, waste management, climate science, traditional and composite building materials, building materials, modelling and simulation, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Construction Materials, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here