Tennakoon, T M M P; Ranasinghe, U; Samaraweera, A; Rameezdeen, R; Gallage, S; Newman, W R; White, B J and Lim, D N T W (2025) Work-related factors affecting mental well-being of young construction workers in South Australia. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 15(3), pp. 682-698. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose: Many work-related factors particularly affect the mental well-being of young construction workers and subsequently affect their productivity at work. Young construction workers in South Australia are more vulnerable than other workers because they consider the distress arising from work-related factors to be part of adapting to a new work life. Therefore, this study seeks to draw out the work-related factors that affect the mental well-being of young construction workers. Design/methodology/approach: The study employed a sequential mixed method approach including a preliminary qualitative case study and a quantitative survey. Around 20 interviews across two organisations were conducted in the initial case study and content analysis was used to contextualise the factors and identify new factors. Then, the outcome of the case study was fed into a questionnaire survey for further analysis. The survey received 43 valid responses. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the survey outcome to assess and categorise the work-related factors. Findings: The findings indicate ten prominent work-related factors contributing to poor mental well-being of young construction workers related to three main categories of factors, namely “nature of work”, “task-related stress” and “unsupportive behaviour”. The work-related factors that have the greatest impact on mental well-being are the machoism culture of industry, work overload and workplace bullying. Originality/value: The outcome from this study enhances the understanding of key work-related factors affecting the mental well-being of young construction workers. Research findings would also help inform the development of clear, industry-informed initiatives tailored to protect and support young construction workers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; mental health; mixed method; South Australia; well-being; young workers |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, methodology, well-being, survey, content analysis, interview, South Australia, mental health, construction worker, principal component analysis, productivity, case study, mixed method, distress |
| Subjects: | practitioner, structural engineering, physical geography and landforms, research methods, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, mental health and wellbeing, statistical analysis, health conditions and diseases, management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here