Exploring the knowledge 'base' of practitioners in the delivery of sustainable regeneration projects

Akotia, J; Opoku, A; Egbu, C and Fortune, C (2016) Exploring the knowledge 'base' of practitioners in the delivery of sustainable regeneration projects. Construction Economics and Building, 16(2), pp. 14-26. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

In recent years, sustainable regeneration has been recognised as being of major economic and social concern in the world. In the UK for instance, government has initiated a number of policies and evaluation methods to deal with some of the environmental problems associated with regeneration projects. However, the post construction evaluation of these projects has often resulted in them being seen as not achieving their set objectives. Attempts aimed at evaluating the impact of sustainability by built environment practitioners have primarily been limited to their assessment of the projects' potential environmental impacts, with the associated socio-economic impacts being neglected. There has not been any well-defined built environment research that has been able to deal holistically with the broader issues of sustainability in terms of benefits/impacts of the regeneration projects to the communities concerned. The findings of an exploratory study that adopted a semi-structured interview approach for data collection, to explore the knowledge and understanding of fifteen practitioners who are often involved in the delivery of these projects are presented. The findings reveal a lack of knowledge and understanding of sustainability as well as structured mechanism/practices for evaluating the socio-economic sustainability factors in relation to regeneration projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: knowledge and understanding; practitioners; sustainability benefit; sustainable regeneration
Index terms: socio-economic impact, built environment research, exploratory study, economic sustainability, interview, practitioner, built environment, regeneration project, environmental impact
Subjects: data collection methods, economic development, research methods, economic and policy analysis, environmental impact, practitioner, research management, infrastructure and transport systems, economic analysis
Topics: Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here