Property values and implications of refurbishment costs

Plat, H T (1996) Property values and implications of refurbishment costs. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 1(2), pp. 57-64. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

The value of a property may, in a stable market situation, depend less on the supply availability of land, but more on the change in the value of the building thereon. For buildings to continue to function efficiently, they must be maintained. This involves the periodic maintenance and refurbishment of the building. This paper examines the cost consequences of this work for both present and prospective owners of property. To overcome inequitable distribution of the costs of refurbishment, the author suggests the creation of special funds. These funds would be deducted from the residual value at the point of transfer of ownership of the property and given to the new owner to pay for the necessary refurbishment work. The paper also discusses how this methodology should be used in relation to the rental levels throughout the life of the property.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: demolition, maintenance, property investment appraisal, property valuation, refurbishment, rent
Index terms: refurbishment work, owner, ownership, land, property value, methodology, appraisal, property investment
Subjects: economics, renovation and retrofit, sociology, real estate economics, research methods, factor and component analysis, economic analysis
Topics: Procurement, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here