Improving early cost advice for mechanical and electrical services by considering functions and client/design team communication

Swaffield, L M and Pasquire, C L (2000) Improving early cost advice for mechanical and electrical services by considering functions and client/design team communication. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 5(1-2), pp. 3-13. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

The paper discusses existing methods of pre-design cost estimating for the mechanical and electrical (M&E) services elements of building projects. The paper then addresses the problem of poor communication between clients and building professionals, leading to misinterpretation of mechanical and electrical (M&E) services requirements and inaccurate cost estimates. The research hypothesised that M&E services cost was related to a building's form and function, and M&E quality. A sufficiently accurate cost estimate depended on an accurate understanding of the quality of M&E services required by the client. This paper proposes a method for improving early design stage communications, to improve interpretation of M&E services quality requirements and lead to more accurate cost estimates. The method involves introducing a briefing workshop to consider functional requirements from the building, possible M&E services solutions, and interfaces between building structure and fabric and the M&E services. The proposed method received support in principle from the field. It is suggested as a valid method of improving early design stage communications between clients and building professionals, that could lead to improved early cost advice for M&E services.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: BCIS elemental analysis, cost data, cost estimating, mechanical and electrical services
Index terms: design team, workshop, cost data, building professional, briefing, cost estimate, cost estimating, early design stage, estimating, design cost
Subjects: design process, profession, professional practice, construction type, financial and cost management, accounting and finance, scope management, economics
Topics: Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here