Hui, E C M (2002) Land use regulations and property market. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 7(1), pp. 65-71. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
This paper presents a brief literature review on the impacts of land supply and regulations on the property market. It addresses the debate of the extent of government intervention in land and housing markets. Governments play a dominant role in the land supply for housing development. With a focus on supply-side issues, this study examines the ways in which governments exert influence in the provision of land for housing. First, it investigates the relationship between land supply and property market. Section 2 examines the impact of government land regulations on property value. Sections 3 and 4 further looks at development/land use control: in terms of zoning regulations and land lease conditions respectively. The paper highlights key relevant research works and attempts to identify the main determinants of land supply that affect the performance of housing market, in terms of housing prices and housing supply.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | land supply, land use regulations, property market |
| Index terms: | housing development, markets, literature review, determinant, regulation, housing, zoning, land, lease, land use, property market, property value |
| Subjects: | land economics, data analysis and analytics, risk assessment, construction type, urban planning, real estate economics, economic analysis, political science |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Governance, Construction Technology, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here