Predicting the academic success of architecture students by pre-enrolment requirement: Using machine-learning techniques

Aluko, R O; Adenuga, O A; Kukoyi, P O; Soyingbe, A A and Oyedeji, J O (2016) Predicting the academic success of architecture students by pre-enrolment requirement: Using machine-learning techniques. Construction Economics and Building, 16(4), pp. 86-98. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of applicants seeking admission into architecture programmes. As expected, prior academic performance (also referred to as pre-enrolment requirement) is a major factor considered during the process of selecting applicants. In the present study, machine learning models were used to predict academic success of architecture students based on information provided in prior academic performance. Two modeling techniques, namely K-nearest neighbour (k-NN) and linear discriminant analysis were applied in the study. It was found that K-nearest neighbour (k-NN) outperforms the linear discriminant analysis model in terms of accuracy. In addition, grades obtained in mathematics (at ordinary level examinations) had a significant impact on the academic success of undergraduate architecture students. This paper makes a modest contribution to the ongoing discussion on the relationship between prior academic performance and academic success of undergraduate students by evaluating this proposition. One of the issues that emerges from these findings is that prior academic performance can be used as a predictor of academic success in undergraduate architecture programmes. Overall, the developed k-NN model can serve as a valuable tool during the process of selecting new intakes into undergraduate architecture programmes in Nigeria.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: academic achievement; nn; architecture students; classification; k; prior academic performance; selection criteria
Index terms: machine learning, selection criteria, modelling, accuracy, programme, academic achievement, Nigeria, undergraduate, discriminant analysis, academic performance, enrolment
Subjects: assessment methods, project controls, recruitment and enrolment, statistical analysis, analytical methods, curriculum development, artificial intelligence, educational resources, tendering, professional development, Geography
Topics: Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Procurement, Digital Applications, Education, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here