Construction site waste: The real cost and benefits available from waste reduction

Tait, P D and Swaffield, L M (2003) Construction site waste: The real cost and benefits available from waste reduction. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 8(1), pp. 3-16. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

This paper discusses research undertaken on physical site waste arising from construction projects. The purpose of the research was to establish the financial benefits available to both contractors and clients from the reduction in construction site waste, and the extent to which any benefits were realised by contractors and clients. This research employed both qualitative and quantitative research methods, including a thorough literature review, semi-structured interviews, a case study and a postal questionnaire. The study identified the cost of construction site waste produced on UK construction projects, the benefits available through the minimisation of this waste, and the financial savings achieved by contractors and clients. The research established that cost benefits were available and realised by contractors through the minimisation of construction site waste. The research also established that the majority of contractors did not view the savings achievable through waste reduction as substantial, although it was recognised that the possible savings were significant sums in relation to construction costs. The research was unable to establish whether clients benefited directly from a reduction in the volume of construction site waste, although it was suggested that clients would benefit indirectly through a reduction in construction costs.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction site waste, waste minimization, cost, financial benefits
Index terms: construction cost, savings, case study, quantitative research, waste reduction, construction project, questionnaire, literature review, construction site, interview, minimization
Subjects: economic analysis, production management, sustainability assessment, algorithms, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management, work location, data collection methods
Topics: Site Management, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Sustainability, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here