Lowe, D (2003) The development of early stage design cost estimating expertise: Effective feedback and systematic reflection for quantity surveyors. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 8(2), pp. 79-88. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
The use of an effective feedback system influences the quality of early stage design cost estimates, for construction projects, prepared by consultant quantity surveyors. Similarly, a means of monitoring performance should be incorporated into any forecasting system. On an individual basis, systematic reflection is crucial for effective experiential learning and is held to be the only process through which a professional may achieve growth and self-renewal. This paper reports, in part, on a fully structured interview survey of experienced quantity surveying practitioners and a questionnaire survey of student quantity surveyors, which investigate the application of effective feedback systems and systematic reflection by early stage design cost estimators. The results indicate that, despite the recommendations of previous studies, many QS practitioners still have inadequate feedback systems. Many either do not systematically reflect on the outcomes of estimates, or use self-assessment as the sole means of evaluation. Also, the QS practitioner sample had significantly lower Reflective Observation learning style scores when compared to the student survey sample, while their declared approach to learning exhibited an aversion for self-assessment or self-appraisal. Finally, on an organisational basis both practitioners and student quantity surveyors gave a low rating to the provision of constructive feedback by the organisation on their performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design cost estimating, experiential learning, feedback systems, quantity surveyors, systematic reflection |
| Index terms: | design cost, forecasting, quantity surveying, estimate, reflection, monitoring, survey, learning style, surveying, interview, experiential learning, estimating, renewal, appraisal, estimator, questionnaire, practitioner, construction project |
| Subjects: | professional development, renovation and retrofit, economics, financial and cost management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, prediction and forecasting, control systems, learning methods, data collection methods, profession, production management, factor and component analysis, practitioner |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Health and Safety, Education, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here