Value management in infrastructure projects in western Australia: Techniques and staging

Whyte, A and Cammarano, C (2012) Value management in infrastructure projects in western Australia: Techniques and staging. In: Smith, S D (ed.) Proceedings of 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK.

Abstract

Infrastructure projects to service the mining industry in Western Australia (WA) are on the increase, somewhat in contrast to a stalling of projects nationally and globally. It remains important therefore for WA companies to be competitive in the realization of a client’s brief. Value management (VM) has long been regarded as an effective means to eliminate unnecessary capital and life-cycle costs, however, while many are familiar with the underlying theory, its use locally is perceived to be less widespread. The research presented here investigates the extent to which value management is implemented by Western Australian engineering and construction companies in both the design and construction fields; exploring, the various value management techniques used in practice and, VM staging. This study documents benefits achieved by means of value management and, the attitudes of industry professionals towards the feasibility or need in establishing a compulsory value management procedure for all (civil engineering) developments. To investigate current value management implementation in WA a pilot-study research methodology embraced a qualitative semi-structured interview approach of ten respondents from organizations involved in design and construction of civil engineering work. Straw poll project results suggest WA industry to be well aware of both, the concept of value management and, the benefits that may arise from its use to address the life-cycle of a project; case-study specification analysis is then presented to explore VM benefits/disbenefits explicitly. The research presented here concludes that industry does have formal value management procedures within a preliminary design phase. Findings show however that industry is resistant to a statutory requirement for value management and, argue that in WA competition is enough to drive the uptake and utilization of VM.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: value management; value engineering; design; specification; western Australia
Index terms: specification, interview, Australia, construction company, value engineering, value management, documents, design and construction, competition, research methodology, mining, preliminary design, implementation, infrastructure project
Subjects: design practice, management, professional development, contractual condition, Geography, geotechnical engineering, market analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, research design and methodology, organization, data collection methods, value management, contractual arrangements
Topics: Value Management, Design Practice, Contract Administration, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here