Structured risk management process to achieve value for money in Public Private Partnerships

Elbing, C and Devapriya, K A K (2004) Structured risk management process to achieve value for money in Public Private Partnerships. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 9(3), pp. 121-128. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

Public-Private Partnership (PPP) is an alternative arrangement for public sector for capacity expansion or upgrade of infrastructure and public services. From the perspective of the public sector, success of PPP arrangements in delivering infrastructure service depends on their ability to optimise value for money of the service delivered. Therefore, a proper risk allocation is needed to achieve value for money for sustainable infrastructure development. This research concentrates on the risk management process that could optimise value for money in the delivery of infrastructure and public services through PPPs. A structured process is presented for identifying, assessing, analysing, allocating and controlling risks over the contract period including design, construction, finance operation and maintenance of infrastructure or public services. A scoring-risk matrix is used within the process to transfer different risks into a risks priority list for risk allocation and control. Relationship between the risk management and organisational arrangement to achieve value for money in PPPs are assessed. The findings shows that a proper risk management practice could facilitate allocating a range of risks and incentives to private sector to improve value for money and thereby to achieve effective infrastructure and public services on a sustainable basis.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: public private partnership, risk management, value for money, project lifecycle, infrastructure
Index terms: infrastructure development, operation and maintenance, value-for-money, public sector, project lifecycle, public services, private sector, partnership, public private partnership, risk allocation, risk management
Subjects: contractual arrangements, project completion, evaluation, financial risk, infrastructure engineering, maintenance engineering, risk assessment, industry analysis, administrative law, partnership management
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Legal Issues, Value Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here