Trifonov, N (2025) Build-up method for capitalization rate: Revisited. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 30(2), pp. 200-211. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to revise the imprecise formulae of the risk build-up method widely used in the practice of property valuation, in particular, in unstable economies. Design/methodology/approach: This paper’s approach is the selection of the risk-free rate in the capitalization rate in the absence of exchange statistics. The equation of returns by analogy with Fisher (1907) and Fisher (1930) is used as a methodological instrument for this. Findings: This study presents exact formulae for build-up method and proposes a set of risk premiums independent of each other. Cases of investments in foreign and local currencies are considered. Research limitations/implications: To determine the values of risk premiums and the asset risk amendment with acceptable accuracy, a sufficient amount of statistical data about the market of the valuated property is required. Practical implications: The application of the build-up method in the revised form will allow for more accurate property valuation, especially in countries where the market is opaque or where there is not a lot of activity. Social implications: The departure from the original version of the build-up method with empirical “justification,” which after more than 30 years of application has become almost universally accepted, indicates a certain maturity of the valuation theory and will allow more effective appraisal of property, such as capital real estate or business. Originality/value: This paper is an original study based on the application of the equation of return to clarify the structure of the capitalization rate. When determining the proposed set of risk premiums, one of the principles of real estate valuation was used – the principle of dependency.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | asset risk amendment; build-up method; capitalization/discount rate; country risk premium; industry risk premium; risk-free rate; valuation currency |
| Index terms: | accuracy, risk premium, risk-free rate, appraisal, methodology, statistics, real estate |
| Subjects: | factor and component analysis, research methods, economic analysis, professional development, real estate economics, mathematical modelling |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here