Detailed design ethnography: Architects embedding low carbon performance

Zapata-Poveda, G (2012) Detailed design ethnography: Architects embedding low carbon performance. In: Smith, S D (ed.) Proceedings of 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK.

Abstract

The United Kingdom is aiming to enforce nearly zero carbon buildings by 2020. The plan has been set into three-year incremental periods to facilitate the transition to zero carbon. In 2008, the Welsh Government announced its aspirations to lead the low carbon pathway in the UK by enforcing higher reduction targets and adopting BREEAM as a planning application condition for new non-domestic buildings. It is anticipated that the building industry will experience changes in its working methods. However, the routine implementation of energy regulations by practitioners remains unknown. In this context, the detailed design phase was investigated to unveil how regulatory requirements were affecting routine architecture practice. The real-time development of a small number of non-domestic projects procured by design and build route was studied by ethnographic methods. The focus was architects' work during detailed design so to reveal how they adopted official tools to embed performance in the fluidity of the process. Architects were using the official assisted to different degrees by informal tools situated in the social context of practice. Architects working on detailed design were likely to transpose, follow and learn about the energy aspirations during low carbon problem solving. Official and informal tools could occupy central, peripheral and mediating roles in the design of low carbon; affecting the articulation of energy aspirations during detailed design and delivery. The in-depth understanding of how low carbon was embedded during detailed design provides insights about how practitioners coped with energy regulations and how low carbon design process could be improved.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: energy; design; building regulation; design and build; architecture
Index terms: design and build, implementation, regulation, design phase, practitioner, architect, problem solving, building industry, low carbon, ethnography, non-domestic building, United Kingdom, BREEAM accreditation, zero carbon building, design process, routine, building regulation
Subjects: construction type, profession, design methods, practitioner, sustainability and energy, environmental policy, contractual arrangements, professional practice, decision-making and reasoning, sustainability assessment, Geography, qualitative and interpretive research, sociology, political science, industry analysis, regulatory law
Topics: Organizational Design, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Governance, Research Practice, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here