Kanguwe, D F (2024) Entrepreneurial orientation and financial performance in the South African construction and materials sector: A focus on bricolage capability and absorptive capacity. PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Abstract
This thesis investigates the relationship between the entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and the sustainable financial performance of the South African construction and materials sector during the 2008-2019 period. In addition, it respectively investigates the moderating effects of environmental hostility on this relationship. Furthermore, in the context of environmental hostility, it investigates the respective moderating effects of the bricolage capability and the absorptive capacity on the same relationship. Moreover, it respectively investigates the moderating effects of organisational identity on the bricolage capability and absorptive capacity as well as the respective moderating effects of the bricolage capability- organisational identity and absorptive capacity-organisational identity interactions on this relationship.This research used a two-study approach to investigate this relationship and its moderating effects. The primary study collected survey data from 126 randomly selected firms in this sector. The secondary study collected secondary sustainable financial performance data from a purposively selected significant group of publicly listed firms. In both cases, data underwent analysis of variance and hierarchical regression. Post hoc analyses using the Tukey honest significance difference (HSD) test, slope analysis, and effect sizes were also used to complement these techniques.The results of the primary study indicate that the EO-sustainable financial performance relationship of this sector exhibited nonlinear, J-shaped behaviour. Furthermore, consistent with the EO-As-Experimentation perspective, the RBV and contingency theory, the results for the moderating effects do not support the hypotheses but rather indicate that all the moderating effects on this relationship were nonlinear suggesting that different configurations of these interactions, yielded different sustainable financial performance outcomes for different levels of EO. The results of the secondary study affirm those of the primary study.By using the theoretical framework of the resource-based and contingency theories, this thesis advances knowledge about the EO-firm performance relationship in the largely under- researched EO-As-Experimentation perspective by contributing a novel conceptual model. Through this conceptual model, this study contributes a unique managerial orientation to the persisting EO-ambidexterity debate in strategic entrepreneurship as well as to the South African construction and materials literature.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Urban, B |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | absorptive capacity; ambidexterity; contingency; entrepreneurship |
| Index terms: | financial performance, ambidexterity, variance, slope, configuration, interaction, entrepreneurship, survey, absorptive capacity, experiment, firm performance, contingency theory, identity |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, behavioral psychology, theoretical framing, sociology, strategic management, business analysis, data collection methods, measurement and scaling, business, geotechnical engineering |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here