Ahiaga-Dagbui D D, S S D (2013) My cost runneth over: Data mining to reduce construction cost overruns. In: Smith, S D and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D D (eds.) Proceedings of 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2013, Reading, UK.
Abstract
Most construction projects overrun their budgets. Among the myriad of explanations giving for construction cost overruns is the lack of required information upon which to base accurate estimation. Much of the financial decisions made at the time of decision to build is thus made in an environment of uncertainty and oftentimes, guess work. In this paper, data mining is presented as key business tool to transform existing data into key decision support systems to increase estimate reliability and accuracy within the construction industry. Using 1600 water infrastructure projects completed between 2004 and 2012 within the UK, cost predictive models were developed using a combination of data mining techniques such as factor analysis, optimal binning and scree tests. These were combined with the learning and generalising capabilities of artificial neural network to develop the final cost models. The best model achieved an average absolute percentage error of 3.67% with 87% of the validation predictions falling within an error range of ±5%. The models are now being deployed for use within the operations of the industry partner to provide real feedback for model improvement.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial neural network; cost estimation; cost overrun; data mining; decision support system |
| Index terms: | decision support, cost estimating, data mining, accuracy, overrun, estimation, artificial neural network, construction cost, cost overrun, cost model, factor analysis, validation, construction project, construction industry, estimate, infrastructure project |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, data science, modelling and simulation, statistical analysis, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, decision analysis, project controls, professional development, production management |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Risk Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here