Computer-aided planning and building process

Abdalla-Salem, S B (2009) Computer-aided planning and building process. PhD thesis, Technische Universitaet Berlin, Germany.

Abstract

This dissertation focuses on the current state of computer aided planning and building process in today’s Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry activities. It is a descriptive work of newly emerging technologies and approaches to design, construction and facility management that offer a great potential to enhance productivities, reduce project cost and project delivery time and improve cooperation and communication between project’s participants. The aim is to provide an in-depth understanding of these technologies and approaches, issues associated with their implementations, and their impacts and effects on the AEC industry’s individuals and organizations. In particular, this work discuss two of the most promising techniques that have huge impact on the AEC industry productivity and performance which are virtual reality (VR) and building information modeling (BIM)

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: building process; modelling; interoperability; virtual reality
Index terms: project cost, cooperation, building process, building information modelling, productivity, emerging technology, virtual reality, modelling, implementation, dissertation, project delivery, interoperability
Subjects: analytical methods, innovation and technology management, contractual arrangements, psychology, research dissemination and communication, building construction, project delivery, virtual reality, information systems, systems and processes, economics, management
Topics: Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Site Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here