Alhabashi, M H (1991) Material management in the United States construction industry. DSc thesis, George Washington University, USA.
Abstract
A recent study of material management in the U. S. construction industry shows that annual material costs are $82 billion. A small improvement in material costs would result in a substantial savings for contractors, which eventually would be passed on to owners due to competitive bidding. Most contractors believe that buying material as soon as possible is most economical because it ensures them against price increases and avoids construction delays. However, they fail to recognize cost factors involved in purchasing material before it is needed. Such factors include financing costs, storage costs, handling costs, and other unpredictable costs such as theft or losses. This research formulated a quantitative model to represent construction material inventories. The Japanese just-in-time philosophy was used to formulate the model. The model's objective is to identify the most economical material procurement policies. The effect of storage limitations and budget constraints on inventory costs in particular are considered. A decision support system, the Optimizer, is presented and fully documented. The program is user friendly. It extracts data from the user, generates the model, then solves the model. The program utilizes Lindo. A case study is presented to test the model. Results indicate that decisions reached by using the new model lower total inventory cost by 7 percent. Methods of implementing the Optimizer in inventory procurement cycles are presented. Two possible systems, a split system and a loop system, are developed.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Murphree, E L |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | United States; bidding; case study; competitive bidding; decision support; financing; inventory; just-in-time; material management; philosophy; purchasing |
| Index terms: | cost factor, budget constraint, savings, owner, purchasing, case study, inventory, construction industry, construction material, philosophy, competitive bidding, decision support, theft, United States, bidding, financing, material procurement, just-in-time, program, construction delay |
| Subjects: | Geography, inventory management, lean logistics, criminal law, bidding, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, software systems, economics, philosophical studies, procurement strategy, industry analysis, project controls, sociology, decision analysis, data collection methods, financial and cost management, building materials |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Time Control, Site Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Risk Management, Supply Chain Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here