Essays on infrastructure development subsidization by product firms

Altuglu, V (2005) Essays on infrastructure development subsidization by product firms. PhD thesis, Columbia University, USA.

Abstract

Sales of radically new products and technological innovations in most instances depend on the development of an associated infrastructure. Infrastructure, as utilized in this thesis, is the development of supporting products, services and systems to capitalize on the adoption of an innovation. Infrastructure development can accelerate product growth, whereas its absence can hinder growth. The main focus of this research is to examine the markets in which infrastructure has an expansionary effect on the demand for a new product and the market behavior of firms in these markets. Of special interest is determining whether and how much product manufacturers invest in infrastructure development. Models of infrastructure development and market expansion effects are developed using two distinct approaches. The first approach utilizes a Bass diffusion model framework. Infrastructure effects are incorporated into the market potential term of the Bass diffusion model. The optimal infrastructure development level for a monopolist is determined in a two-period setting using different functional forms. The second approach utilizes a product differentiation model in a monopolistic competition setting. In this setting, two product manufacturers compete in the product market whereas there is a monopoly in the infrastructure market. The positive effects of infrastructure development are incorporated into the model by the use of interdependent demand functions. The conditions under which the product manufacturers subsidize the infrastructure firm are determined.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Lehmann, D
Uncontrolled Keywords: competition; differentiation; innovation; market; markets
Index terms: technological innovation, markets, product differentiation, competition, differentiation, manufacturer, infrastructure development
Subjects: infrastructure engineering, market analysis, practitioner, organization, innovation and technology management, economic analysis, business
Topics: Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here