Bauch, G T (1999) A statistical project control tool for engineering managers. PhD thesis, University of Houston, USA.
Abstract
Engineering managers make decisions daily to ensure their project is meeting customer requirements. The project environment is highly dynamic and decisions must be made quickly based on experience and data readily available from internal and external sources. This research evolved from a fundamental belief that proven engineering quality control methods applied to hardware processes can also be applied to project management processes. This research was limited to process, power, heavy equipment, general building, and environmental projects in the construction industry. The research problem statement is supported by historic accounts of a large number of project failures. These failures occur as delays, budget overruns, cancellations, and customer requirement shortfalls. This dissertation advocates a practical easy-to-use quantitative benchmarking tool to help managers guide the project successfully and reduce the large losses of capital investment in the US. The research procedure and methodology utilized a modified Shewhart control chart used in manufacturing processes since the 1920s and applied it to project management processes. This new chart is called the Statistical Project Control Tool (SPCT). Quantitative variables that are indicators of project success were plotted versus time-periods. These actual real-time data were plotted in control chart form with statistical limit zones. Pattern analysis rules were used to determine real-time “health” of the process. The research results were four valid control charts for each variable derived from twenty similar successful projects. There is a different control chart for each of four variables—actual owner expenditure, actual % design complete, actual % construction complete and actual cost of change orders—used as a function of time periods during the project life cycle. Three successful and three failed projects were plotted on each of the four control charts. Validation was accomplished by comparing the project owners' judgment with the control chart results. The results indicated that projects judged successful by their owners followed an “in control” pattern and projects judged unsuccessful by their owners followed an “out of control” pattern. The “out of control” patterns were described by six rules. A new dynamic decision-making tool for project management benchmarking is now available.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | benchmarking; capital investment; equipment; investment; life cycle; manufacturing; owner; project control; project success; quality control |
| Index terms: | hardware, project management process, project management, project control, dissertation, quality control, construction industry, project failure, project success, judgment, real-time data, change order, life cycle, owner, manufacturing process, validation, budget overrun, decision-making, methodology, benchmarking, capital investment, actual cost, manager |
| Subjects: | project completion, research dissemination and communication, practitioner, economic analysis, research methods, manufacturing engineering, computer hardware, dispute resolution, control systems, value management, project delivery, financial and cost management, performance measurement, project management theory and practice, professional development, contractual condition, sociology, decision analysis, data management, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here