Reconceptualising hospital facility resilience to extreme weather events using a panarchy model

Chand A M, L M (2013) Reconceptualising hospital facility resilience to extreme weather events using a panarchy model. In: Smith, S D and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D D (eds.) Proceedings of 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2013, Reading, UK.

Abstract

Hospitals represent critical social infrastructure assets that are essential for the effective functioning of any society and economy. The increasing incidence of climate-related extreme weather provides major challenges for hospitals and there is increasing evidence of hospital services being disrupted during such events. Given the vulnerability of hospitals to extreme weather and the significance of their service delivery to social and economic wellbeing, there is an urgent need for research into the factors that contribute towards hospital resilience in these situations. Using a panarchy model to integrate theories of ecological resilience, adaptation and learning, a new conceptual framework is presented to inform future research in this area and the way that hospital buildings are managed, used and adapted to make them more resilient to EWEs.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: hospital; panarchy; resilience; learning; adaptation
Index terms: society, hospital facility, adaptation, weather, service delivery, vulnerability, conceptual framework, evidence, extreme weather event, well-being
Subjects: communities and social development, construction type, mental health and wellbeing, theoretical framing, climate science, air quality, user focus, evaluation and assessment methods, service delivery, environmental hazards
Topics: Design Practice, Sustainability, Research Practice, Project Management, Health and Safety, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here