Candaş, A B (2022) Multipurpose semantic analysis of construction text documentation. PhD thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
Abstract
Construction contracts are crucial documents as they outline the agreement. In case any vagueness is present in contract sentences, the interpretation of the sentences will vary between different parties of the contract. Such a case would cause a dispute and eventually adversely affect the construction project's success. Additionally, multiple parties that sign the contract and various departments/disciplines within a party need to be aware of the content of these contracts. All these departments review and apply the contract conditions only from their perspective. An additional effort is required for the coordination of such different departments. The above examples are related to the practice of contract administration and interpretation processes of contract documents. The conventional approach for these processes is manual, prone to errors, requires expert involvement, and is time-consuming. Automation efforts for such manual processes would remove such deficiencies, as it will provide a certain level of standardization. A significant part of these contracts is text documents, which provide an unstructured nature of data. Recent advancements in the artificial intelligence field allow tackling the hardship of studying and analyzing unstructured data. Thus, this study proposes an approach that comprises a sequential application of natural language processing and supervised machine learning applications to desired automation. The proposed methodology reduces time spent in coordination efforts of contract review, also reliably and accurately predicts (i) classification of contract sentences for departmental relevance, (ii) vagueness presence in contract sentences, and also removes the dependence on expert participation.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Tokdemir, O B |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial intelligence; automation; contract administration; contract conditions; coordination; documentation; learning; machine learning; participation; standardization |
| Index terms: | unstructured data, documentation, machine learning, construction project, methodology, contract document, documents, dispute, contract condition, contract administration, automation, machine learning application, artificial intelligence, coordination, standardization, construction contract, presence |
| Subjects: | environmental science, contract type, research methods, contract management, automation and robotics, production management, data science, artificial intelligence, dispute resolution, management, performance measurement, contract structure, professional development, contractual condition |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Research Practice, Information Management, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Project Management, Procurement, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here