Crandell, D (2018) Enhancing traditional earned value management with three-point estimates to produce probability based performance forecasts and contingency funding projections for engineering-construction projects. DEngr thesis, George Washington University, USA.
Abstract
Too long have engineering and construction managers overestimated their costs and durations to create a contingency buffer that ensures construction projects meet a tight plus-or-minus 10% target range for both cost and schedule performance –a range intended to assess estimating accuracy, not project performance. This praxis proposes an alternative cost performance measure based on merging two project management best practices. By using three-point estimates with its probability ranges brought into earned value performance measures, an engineering-construction project can be evaluated on statistically-produced ranges specific and realistic to the project. Three-point estimates use optimistic, pessimistic, and likely estimates in a weighted formula to establish statistical values for means, variances, and probabilities. These three-point estimate statistic values provide greater options for the earned value calculation to describe current and future performance with probability terms. Analysis of simulated and real projects found that using three-point based earned value produced more accurate and precise forecasts, provided more reliable contingency cost estimates, and produced less volatile cash flow adjustments over the project lifecycle. The practical application is an enhanced earned value technique that replaces traditional earned value and can calculate project specific contingency reserves to replace the use of generic percentage mark-up techniques.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Bersson, T and Young, S |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; contingency; earned value management; estimating; funding; lifecycle; mark-up; probability; project performance; value management |
| Index terms: | performance measure, accuracy, earned value management, mark-up, cash flow, schedule performance, contingency reserve, cost performance, estimating, construction project, construction manager, project lifecycle, variance, praxis, estimate, cost estimate, duration, option, project management, best practice, funding, value management, buffer, lifecycle, project performance |
| Subjects: | price determination, project controls, measurement and scaling, decision analysis, project management theory and practice, professional development, performance measurement, management, financial management, economics, financial and cost management, project delivery, control systems, profession, business, production management, reflexivity, financial risk, economic analysis, project completion |
| Topics: | Procurement, Risk Management, Project Management, Value Management, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here