Lemma, M; Tarsi, M and Carbonari, A (2025) Development of a framework to track life safety levels of occupants in the event of a fire in buildings. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 21(4), pp. 681-704. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
In the operational phase of buildings, tracking what modifications can have an impact on the expected facility performances through manual checks can be impractical, albeit very important from a facility management perspective. The transition from the traditional prescriptive method towards the performance-based approach for building design and management may facilitate quantitative assessment of performances and may lead to conscious decisions which includes preparedness in the event of emergencies. The main goal of this paper is to develop a framework, compliant with a Building Information Modelling (BIM) environment, to track fire safety performance levels, in terms of life safety of occupants. As long as this is done through the definition of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that are being tracked continuously, facility managers can have a comprehensive and updated overview of current performances of a facility. More specifically, a single representative KPI was set and evaluated for several fire scenarios, using a set of simulation and data management tools. The results of the assessment were processed and transformed into a visual representation, referenced to a grid superimposed over the building layout to quantitatively represent the safety of occupants at every point of the building. The results were then sent back and displayed into the BIM model, for seamless accessibility by facility managers. The proposed methodology was tested on a pilot building, assuming two fire scenarios. This approach enabled supervision of a building's compliance with fire safety requirements, in terms of occupants' life safety, throughout the building lifecycle.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | BIM; fire safety management; KPIs; life safety; performance-based approach |
| Index terms: | building design, building information modelling, accessibility, key performance indicator, data management, lifecycle, supervision, fire safety, manager, compliance, methodology, performance-based |
| Subjects: | practitioner, architectural design, research methods, inclusive design, health safety and environment, control systems, project delivery, performance measurement, data management, information systems |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Quality Management, Project Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here