A social-product-process framework for construction

Turk, Ž and Klinc, R (2020) A social-product-process framework for construction. Building Research & Information, 48(7), pp. 747-762. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

This paper introduces a new framework for understanding, modelling and software engineering in construction information activities. The current framework is based on understanding that products are the results of processes, which are performed by actors. Such frameworks are influenced by the available technology. The Internet of today is supporting also other kinds of human activities: communication and social interactions among humans. The construction industry uses them as well but without having a proper understanding of their role. There is a gap in the current framework. In this paper, the relevant theories to specify this gap in terms of what could exist in theory and what is offered by technology are analysed. As a result, a new framework of construction information activities that fills the gap is proposed. The key concepts and relations among them are identified and elaborated within the existing framework. The framework introduces the third major integrative element of the otherwise fragmented construction information activities–the social network–the existing two being the physical building and its digital twin. The framework provides a theoretical and conceptual basis for designing, planning, creating, monitoring and evaluating construction-related online services that include a strong social component and use social media services.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: BIM; construction; process modelling; social media; workflow
Index terms: construction industry, modelling, internet, social interaction, human activity, monitoring, social media, digital twin, workflow, software engineering, social network, process modelling
Subjects: digital engineering, analytical methods, design analysis, control systems, computing systems, technology adoption, software systems, management, industry analysis, sociology
Topics: Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here