Kalla, M; Kalaycioglu, O; Hecht, R; Schneider, S and Schmidt, C (2024) Station biophilia: Assessing the perception of greenery on railway platforms using a digital twin. Building Research & Information, 52(1-2), pp. 164-180. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The increasing density of urban spaces and buildings is undermining public health. To compensate, there is a growing trend towards biophilic design, including at one of the most frequented and highly functional sites: railway stations. Previous studies have confirmed the economic feasibility of station greenery and users' preference for this but also their reluctance to pay for greenery compared to other services. One research gap is the lack of consideration given to the full range and dose–response correlation of urban cultural ecosystem services provided by station greenery. To fill this gap, we present the development and implementation of a method using static 2D representations of virtual reality scenes generated from a digital twin. In a between-subjects experiment (N = 352), participants were randomly assigned to assess one of three levels of greenery by means of a six-item semantic differential. Supported by statistically significant differences between groups, we could identify improvements in well-being, aesthetics, stress reduction, perception of safety, psychological noise reduction and identity. Further, women were found to prefer higher levels of greenery than men. Based on our results, we recommend applying the method to evaluate planning options and that (more) greenery be introduced at metropolitan stations as part of biophilic design.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | gender issues; public health; transport; virtual reality |
| Index terms: | ecosystem services, aesthetic, public health, density, biophilia, platform, implementation, noise reduction, option, biophilic, virtual reality, gender issue, identity, women, experiment, railway station, preference, digital twin, well-being, urban space |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, environmental health, sociology, decision analysis, biodiversity, design incorporating nature, data collection methods, mental health and wellbeing, virtual reality, urban design and public space, digital design, factor and component analysis, decision-making and reasoning, contractual arrangements, analytical methods, acoustic engineering, human factors and perception, digital engineering |
| Topics: | Ethics, Risk Management, Procurement, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here