Han, J and Ye, N (2025) Changing identities of architects in China and the UK from the 1950s to the 1990s. Building Research & Information, 53(5), pp. 553-564. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
As transnational societal and professional imperatives continue to transform the professional identities of architects worldwide, architects in many localities have been unable to comprehend, much less align with, the multi-cultural norms that serve increasingly as terms of reference for navigating their practice. However, a diversified understanding of professional identity has yet to come forward. Post-war transitions from the 1950s constituted dramatic ideological changes that redefined the profession in both China and the UK, but in different ways. The globalizing trends of the 1990s then greatly impacted the identity of architects in both countries, accelerating the profession's transformation. To elucidate these processes, this paper investigates transitions in architects' professional statuses, through decline and revival, from the 1950s to the 1990s in the two countries. The historical reflection of this period provides a well-rounded understanding of the multiple faces in the professional identity of architects in each context. By applying Wenger's three essential modes of belonging to a community of practice to a comparative analysis, this paper enriches the framework in exploring architects' identity struggles considering the complex relationships between local and global, private and public, the real and the imagined, and the modern and the antimodern in different societies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architects; China; comparative study; professional identity; UK |
| Index terms: | face, comparative analysis, society, China, norms, transformation, comparative study, profession, war, reflection, architect, identity |
| Subjects: | institututions, psychology, conflict and crisis studies, Geography, communities and social development, profession, business, research design and methodology, data analysis and analytics, professional development, sociology |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Legal Issues, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here