Assessment of students' productivity in context of indoor environmental quality and personal factors

Bajc, T and Kerčov, A (2025) Assessment of students' productivity in context of indoor environmental quality and personal factors. Building Research & Information, 53(5), pp. 620-635. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of personal factors on students' productivity and relation with Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) parameters through thermal comfort in a university classroom. The research is based on experimental research involving measurements, 240 productivity tests created for the purpose of the research and participation of 99 respondents. Paper proposes a novel approach, correlating personal occupants' parameters with thermal comfort and Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) parameters that affect productivity. The novel approach implies the inclusion of all experimentally measured parameters that affect productivity in the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) calculation, with the aim of distinguishing the impact caused by personal factors alone. This approach has not been used before and presents a significant gap between the existing prediction calculation models in literature and results obtained in real environments. The differences between calculated and measured productivity in real environments can be substantial, reaching over 80%. Approximately 80% of measured productivity values within the PMV range of −0.25–1 are impacted by personal factors. The importance of personal factors might be greater concerning how often they affect productivity, as opposed to the extent of their influence.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: indoor environmental quality; occupants' interaction with environment; personal factors; productivity; thermal comfort
Index terms: productivity, indoor air quality, thermal comfort, interaction, indoor environmental quality, classroom
Subjects: management, environmental engineering, construction type, behavioral psychology, environmental health
Topics: Construction Technology, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here