Han, J M; Estrella Guillén, E; Liu, S; Chen, Y and Samuelson, H W (2025) Using explainable artificial intelligence to predict sleep interruptions from indoor environmental conditions: An empirical study. Building Research & Information, 53(5), pp. 636-655. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Research has proven that the ideal thermal comfort parameters for sleep differ from those for awake conditions. However, predicting thermal comfort for sleep is challenging, especially studies that permit subjects to perform normal adaptive behaviour such as choosing their own sleepwear and adding or removing blankets. Therefore, this study uses empirical data to predict subjects' sleep interruptions from indoor environmental quality (IEQ) conditions. We monitored 15 human subjects in their own homes over 378 total person-nights, under their preferred sleeping conditions, recording asleep, awake, and restless periods, via wristband fitness trackers. We simultaneously monitored indoor environmental variables including dry-bulb temperature, relative humidity, sound pressure levels, and carbon dioxide concentrations. By using explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), specifically, the XGBoost model, the study revealed that CO2 levels and heat index demonstrate the most significant association with sleep classification. Within the observed conditions of 16–25°C (with most observations falling within 21–23°C), an increase of 1.4°C in the average temperature and a 2–6% fluctuation in relative humidity tended to increase restlessness in the subjects. When temperature fluctuations exceeded 60% relative to the mean temperature, these fluctuations were correlated with a significant 50% reduction in sleep efficiency.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | human subject; indoor environmental quality; restlessness; sleep disruption; sleep quality; thermal comfort |
| Index terms: | artificial intelligence, thermal comfort, indoor environmental quality, empirical study, adaptive behaviour, efficiency, environmental conditions, relative humidity, human subject, sleep quality, carbon dioxide |
| Subjects: | environmental health, environmental engineering, health conditions and diseases, performance management, artificial intelligence, human factors, air quality, research management, research methods, environmental science, climate science |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here