Liu, J; Liu, G; Wang, N; Pan, M and Jiang, Y (2025) Predicting structural deterioration of large-scale building clusters using snapshot data: An integrated Markov-LSTM model. Building Research & Information, 53(6), pp. 700-716. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
To ensure a safe environment for occupants, predicting long-term structural deterioration of buildings is critical. However, existing models have limited capability to predict structural deterioration with mathematical tractability and accuracy, especially for large-scale building clusters. To address this gap, this study aims to establish a new integrated Markov-LSTM model, combining the strengths of model-driven and data-driven methods, for enhanced structural deterioration prediction. Specifically, the proposed two-stage inhomogeneous Markov chain allows the deterioration process to be tractable through the derivation of analytical transition probabilities. To further improve the accuracy, long short-term memory (LSTM) is employed to predict the residuals calculated from Markov-based predictions and true values. The performance of the proposed model is evaluated through two case studies, using snapshot data of large-scale building clusters. The results demonstrate significant improvements over benchmark models, with the reduction of mean absolute error (MAE) by an average of 0.1780 (and 0.3292), mean squared error (MSE) by 0.1421 (and 0.5717), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) by 4.7778% (and 13.2736%) in Case 1 (and Case 2). This study contributes to research and practice in structural deterioration prediction by providing both mathematical tractability and accuracy, focusing on large-scale building clusters, and supporting more effective condition-based maintenance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building deterioration; condition-based maintenance; inhomogeneous Markov chain; LSTM neural network; residual correction; structural safety |
| Index terms: | neural network, accuracy, deterioration, case study, Markov chain |
| Subjects: | mathematical modelling, data collection methods, material degradation and durability, artificial intelligence, professional development |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Construction Materials, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 CEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here