Song, X; Carlsson, C and Nguyen, D (2025) Life cycle assessment of geotechnical works for high-rise building construction on soft clay in Sweden. Building Research & Information, 53(6), pp. 717-733. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Achieving climate-neutral building construction requires a comprehensive understanding of the climate impact of all relevant building elements, including geotechnical works. However, research on life cycle assessment (LCA) of geotechnical works in building construction remains limited. This study conducted a 'cradle-to-handover' LCA of geotechnical works for a 36-storey office building situated on soft clay in Sweden. Using project-specific data and the European Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method v3.1 in SimaPro v9.6.0.1, the geotechnical works (modules A1–A5) contributed a climate impact of 121.1 kg CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) per square metre (m2) of gross floor area (GFA). This accounts for approximately 23.9% of the total climate impact during the construction stage, assuming the superstructure meets the proposed national-level limit value of 385 kg CO2eq/m2 GFA in Sweden. The three main contributors to the total climate impact of the geotechnical works were steel piles (64.9%), concrete piles (22.3%) and sheet pile walls (9.9%). The results highlight the need to incorporate geotechnical works into decarbonization strategies for building construction, particularly in challenging soil conditions. Furthermore, the study underscores the importance of fostering more effective communication among stakeholders to drive sustainability efforts throughout the building construction stage.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building construction; foundations; geotechnical works; life cycle assessment; soft clay |
| Index terms: | gross floor area, office building, decarbonization strategy, foundations, Sweden, module, building construction, life cycle assessment, high-rise building |
| Subjects: | building construction, climate science, structural engineering, building performance, construction type, environmental impact, architectural elements, Geography |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Geographical Context, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here