Symonds, P; Simpson, C H; Petrou, G; Ferguson, L; Mavrogianni, A and Davies, M (2024) Linking housing, socio-demographic, environmental and mental health data at scale. Buildings & Cities, 5(1), pp. 470-488. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
Mental disorders are a growing problem worldwide, putting pressure on healthcare systems and wider society. Anxiety and depression are estimated to cost the global economy US$1 trillion per year, yet only 2% of global median government healthcare expenditure goes towards mental health. There is growing evidence linking housing, socioeconomic status and local environmental conditions with mental health inequalities. The aim of this paper is to link several open-access datasets at the local area level (N = 32,844) for England to clinical mental health metrics and describe initial statistical findings. Two mental health metrics were used: Small Area Mental Health Index (SAMHI) and diagnosed depression prevalence. To demonstrate the utility of the longitudinal mental health data, changes in depression prevalence were investigated over two study periods (2011–19, i.e. austerity; and 2019–22, i.e. COVID-19). These data were linked to housing data (energy efficiency, floor area, year built, type and tenure) from Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs); socio-demographic data (age, sex, income and education deprivation, household size) from administrative records; and local environment data (winter temperature, air pollution and access to green space). The linked dataset provides a useful resource with which to investigate the social and environmental determinants of mental health. PRACTICE RELEVANCE Initial observations of the data revealed a non-linear relationship between home energy efficiency (EPC band) and the mental health metrics, with depression prevalence higher in local areas where the mode EPC bands were C and D, compared with B and E. Researchers can further investigate this relationship using the dataset through robust statistical analysis, adjusting for confounding variables. National and local governments may use the dataset to help allocate resources to prevent and treat mental health conditions. Practitioners can map and interrogate the data to describe their local areas and make preliminary conclusions about the relationships between the built environment and mental health. This preliminary analysis of the data demonstrated a gradient in SAMHI and depression prevalence with income and employment deprivation at the local area level.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | data linkages; geographic information system; health inequalities; housing; mental health; neighbourhoods |
| Index terms: | practitioner, anxiety, evidence, environmental conditions, housing, deprivation, dataset, society, COVID-19, local government, air pollution, winter, austerity, built environment, energy performance certificate, inequality, household, income, mental health, tenure, determinant, geographic information system, depression, energy efficiency, England, statistical analysis, mental disorder, employment, linkage |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, business, mental health and wellbeing, sustainability and energy, real estate economics, data science, energy systems, management, health risk and incident analysis, data management, health conditions and diseases, sociology, administrative law, infrastructure and transport systems, evaluation and assessment methods, construction type, climate science, practitioner, environmental science, economic analysis, Geography, demography, geographical techniques and analysis, social justice, communities and social development |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Ethics, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here