Nwagwu, C C; Akin, S and Hertwich, E G (2024) Modelling Nigerian residential dwellings: bottom-up approach and scenario analysis. Buildings & Cities, 5(1), pp. 521-539. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
Nigeria's residential buildings consume a substantial amount of the country's energy, so achieving a net-zero building sector with a rapidly growing population is a key challenge. To bridge the gap in research at a national level and support Nigeria's commitment to an unconditional 20% reduction in emissions by 2030, this study develops bottom-up archetype models of different residential building typologies to estimate the energy and material use of Nigerian residential buildings. This creates an overview of the residential stock and how different archetypes perform. The study calculates a baseline energy and material use of Nigeria's residential building stock using the BuildME tool and converts these data into CO2 emissions using a life-cycle assessment. Scenarios are modelled for 2020. Nigeria's residential dwellings use approximately 0.3 kt of material per dwelling over a lifetime of 50 years and 2404 kWh/yr of energy per dwelling. Annualised, dwellings emit 2500 kgCO2-eq per dwelling due to material and energy use. Scenarios proposed for meeting Nigeria's emissions targets will require improved energy efficiency, decarbonising the building envelope through a shift in construction materials and decarbonising grid electricity. POLICY RELEVANCE This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the energy and material use of residential buildings in Nigeria, focusing on achieving the country's commitment to a 20% reduction in emissions by 2030. It employs a bottom-up approach to model energy and material use, revealing the peculiarities of the dwelling stock across Nigeria's four climatic zones. The study explores the implications of different policy scenarios on sustainable housing. The research suggests that meeting Nigeria's emissions targets requires improved energy efficiency, a shift in construction materials and decarbonisation of grid electricity. It also highlights the potential benefits of a policy switch to materials such as timber, earthen blocks, adobe bricks and clay, which could significantly reduce construction-related emissions. These changes could improve the quality of life of households in Nigeria, combat climate change on a global scale and bring economic advantages to Nigeria.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | archetype; building stock; energy modelling; life-cycle assessment; Nigeria; residential buildings |
| Index terms: | climate change, population, quality of life, commitment, building stock, energy modelling, sustainable housing, building envelope, modelling, energy use, bottom-up approach, estimate, scenario analysis, archetype, household, construction material, Nigeria, CO2 emissions, energy efficiency, residential building |
| Subjects: | architectural elements, Geography, housing and residential development, demography, asset management, construction type, policy studies, climate science, psychology, urban planning, analytical methods, public and environmental health, air quality, building materials, sustainability and energy, modelling and simulation, energy systems, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Governance, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here