Environmental effects of urban wind energy harvesting: A review

Tsionas, I; Llaguno-Munitxa, M and Stephan, A (2025) Environmental effects of urban wind energy harvesting: A review. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), pp. 1-24. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Transitioning to renewable energy resources is necessary to address the energy and climate crisis and to be in accordance with UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 7, 11 and 13. Urban wind energy harvesting is still emerging mainly with the use of small wind turbines. Given their implementation challenges, positive and negative effects need to be weighed to make informed policy decisions and regulations. This systematic review evaluates the macro-and micro-scale environmental effects related to implementing small urban wind turbines (SUWTs). Although publications exist on diverse aspects of SUWTs, a review that addresses the broad range of identified environmental effects of SUWT implementations has been lacking until now. This review shows that while the study of the SUWTs' environmental effects can build on the effects associated with large wind turbines, there are also significant differences. Given the heterogeneity of urban conditions, the implementation of SUWTs requires detailed local environmental assessment to characterise accurately most environmental effects, notably the net life-cycle primary energy performance and associated GHG emissions, raw materials depletion, recycling, safety, noise, visual and light pollution, and effects on urban wildlife. Effects that require further investigation and which possibly raise regulatory or social acceptance issues are identified and discussed. POLICY RELEVANCE Harvesting urban wind energy can yield multiple environmental, efficiency and resilience benefits. However, several research and policy gaps remain to be addressed before deploying small wind turbines in urban contexts. These include: the need to quantify the net environmental gains of SUWTs based on their performance and life-cycle assessment; the structural implications of deploying SUWTs on existing buildings; the effect of SUWTs on local air quality and microclimates; the potential health and safety risks to those who may pass by; the effects of SUWTs on ecosystems; and the combined effects of SUWTs on people (e.g. noise or light annoyance). Further research and regulation can help to minimise the negative impacts and ensure social acceptability.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: clean energy; policy; regulations; small urban wind turbines; sustainability; wind turbine
Index terms: environmental effect, systematic literature review, urban wind, publication, clean energy, pollution, regulation, environmental assessment, air quality, recycling, primary energy, depletion, implementation, microclimate, health and safety, renewable energy resource, sustainable development goal, efficiency, investigation
Subjects: data collection methods, environmental impact, health safety and environment, energy systems, environmental health, research evaluation and metrics, performance management, research dissemination and communication, waste management, political science, environmental resource management, climate science, environmental science, contractual arrangements, sustainable design
Topics: Quality Management, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Information Management, Governance, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here