Savoie, É; Sapinski, J P and Laroche, A M (2025) Key factors for revitalising heritage buildings through adaptive reuse. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), pp. 103-120. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
This study investigates the preservation through adaptive reuse of derelict heritage buildings at risk of demolition in urban settings in New Brunswick, Canada. Despite the demonstrated benefits of adaptive reuse in balancing heritage preservation and contemporary urban needs, small cities face significant challenges: financial constraints, regulatory barriers and technical limitations. Using a multiple-case study approach, adaptive reuse projects in Moncton, Fredericton and Saint John are examined to identify key factors contributing to their success. Findings reveal that prioritising structural adaptability, cultural value and long-term sustainability over profit-driven redevelopment models is essential. Successful adaptive reuse projects rely on collaborative governance frameworks, phased financial strategies, early involvement of technical expertise and active community engagement. This approach is critical to overcoming challenges such as hazardous material management, regulatory barriers and funding limitations. This study demonstrates that adaptive reuse can transform neglected heritage buildings into functional spaces, contributing to urban regeneration, cultural preservation and sustainability, while offering a framework for future adaptive reuse initiatives in similar contexts. PRACTICE RELEVANCE The findings highlight key implications for advancing adaptive reuse as a strategy for heritage preservation and sustainability. Prioritising building location, adaptability and cultural value over profit-driven approaches is essential to fostering adaptive reuse initiatives. Establishing clear governance frameworks can align public, private and community efforts, facilitating collaboration to overcome common challenges. Financial incentives, such as grants or tax relief, can address issues such as hazardous material management, while adaptive regulatory processes can streamline approvals. Addressing expertise shortages through targeted training programmes and cross-regional collaboration is particularly important for smaller regions. Additionally, integrating sustainability principles and promoting material reuse within adaptive reuse projects can enhance environmental performance and urban resilience. These measures demonstrate how adaptive reuse can revitalise neglected heritage buildings into functional, purposeful spaces that contribute to cultural continuity, community identity and sustainable urban development.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptive reuse; buildings; Canada; heritage preservation; sustainability; urban regeneration; value preservation |
| Index terms: | redevelopment, urban resilience, urban regeneration, shortages, collaboration, adaptability, heritage building, strategy, face, programme, profit, financial incentive, approval, funding, identity, financial strategy, adaptive reuse, community engagement, sustainable urban development, Canada, environmental performance, prioritizing, case study, governance |
| Subjects: | sustainability and resilience, financial and cost management, business, data collection methods, community and social dimensions, decision analysis, sociology, project controls, infrastructure and transport systems, post-disaster and reconstruction, management, psychology, economic analysis, user focus, construction type, contractual role, sustainability assessment, Geography, sustainable design |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Time Control, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Governance, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Risk Management, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here