Berker, T and Woods, R (2025) Resistance against zero-emission neighbourhood infrastructuring: Key lessons from Norway. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), pp. 345-358. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
This article analyses non-trivial forms of resistance encountered in the implementation of zero-emission neighbourhoods in Norway, based on eight years of living lab experiments and interviews with key stakeholders. Drawing on a socio-material approach to infrastructuring, it identifies three distinct categories of resistance: tensions between professional groups—particularly between energy and construction sectors; resistance 'from above' through lack of political and regulatory support; and resistance 'from below' by local stakeholders and future users. The analysis reveals that these forms of resistance go beyond simple opposition to change, instead reflecting deep-seated professional practices, shifting political priorities and local social contexts that compete with or contradict zero-emission planning goals. PRACTICE RELEVANCE For practitioners and policymakers, this study demonstrates that successful implementation of zero-emission neighbourhoods requires more than technical solutions and regulatory frameworks. The findings suggest that—at least in the Norwegian context—future zero-emission planning must better integrate diverse professional expertise, particularly from energy and building experts, but also from local planners and user groups, while developing strategies that can succeed with minimal state support. These insights can help practitioners design more inclusive and effective approaches to neighbourhood-scale decarbonisation efforts.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | change management; cities; climate mitigation; decarbonisation; infrastructure; neighbourhood; net zero carbon; Norway; overcoming resistance; socio-material |
| Index terms: | planner, net zero, implementation, interview, experiment, Norway, strategy, user group, change management, drawing, mitigation, practitioner, professional practice, construction sector |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, client relations, practitioner, financial risk, Geography, technical documentation, energy systems, profession, data collection methods, industry analysis, management, professional development |
| Topics: | Procurement, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here