Beyond the building: Governance challenges in social housing retrofit

Charles, H (2025) Beyond the building: Governance challenges in social housing retrofit. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), pp. 433-449. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Retrofitting housing is central to addressing climate change and energy vulnerability goals. Retrofits can provide value in social housing due to the sector's prevalence of low-income tenants (who face greater energy vulnerability) and the large, landlord-owned stock. Despite significant potential benefits, multiple complex barriers to achieving the sector's retrofit goals persist. These barriers are examined by focusing on how privatisation and neoliberal policymaking have shaped social housing delivery and retrofit efforts in England. Two datasets are used to explore these issues: an organisational ethnography of a housing association (HA) in north-west England (n = 10) and expert interviews (n = 21). Key themes identified through thematic analysis include: (1) issues in retrofitting social homes (at HA scale), (2) fragmented social housing provision and (3) insufficient government support. HAs face significant financial constraints, with limited income from fixed rents and chronic underfunding. Inconsistent government funding has created a boom-and-bust cycle, limiting the availability of trained contractors and impeding progress. Clear policies and sustained investment in retrofit technologies are needed to stabilise the sector and support contractor upskilling. The findings are relevant to other neoliberal contexts pursuing social housing retrofit goals.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: austerity; energy efficiency; energy justice; neoliberalism; retrofit; social housing; UK
Index terms: thematic analysis, vulnerability, housing association, housing, retrofitting, climate change, dataset, justice, austerity, interview, tenant, face, neoliberalism, funding, income, social housing, privatization, landlord, governance, government support, England, energy efficiency, ethnography
Subjects: methods and analysis, qualitative and interpretive research, renovation and retrofit, economic theory, sociology, data management, business, government bodies, data collection methods, sustainability and energy, institutional client, Geography, environmental hazards, housing and residential development, practitioner, climate science, construction type, economic analysis, legal systems, psychology
Topics: Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Governance, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here