Keskiniva, K; Saari, A and Junnonen, J M (2023) Suggestions for takt production subcontract clauses: A conceptual study. Construction Innovation, 23(2), pp. 425-442. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to provide a foundation for the development of subcontracts that suit takt production in construction. Design/methodology/approach: This is a non-empiric conceptual study, which integrates takt production and general construction literature into new proposals for subcontract clauses suitable for takt production in construction. This study uses literature reviews, from which proposals regarding takt production viable subcontract clauses are conducted via logical reasoning. Findings: A total of 13 proposals for takt production applicable subcontracts are provided in this study. The proposals emphasize detailed and collaborative planning, suitable payment methods and flexibility for takt plan modification. Originality/value: Previous takt literature has not properly addressed the development of subcontracts for takt production, despite regular attempts to use subcontracting in takt production. This study aims to aid main contractors to create fair and suitable subcontracts, so that adhering to takt schedules could be more viable in practice. This study also acts as a foundation for further empirical studies regarding the subject.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | lean; lean construction; subcontract; subcontracting; takt production |
| Index terms: | empirical study, main contractor, subcontracting, methodology, subcontract, proposal, collaborative planning, reasoning, lean construction, literature review |
| Subjects: | cognitive psychology, building construction, research methods, project planning, urban planning, practitioner, contract type, organization, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Project Management, Supply Chain Management, Research Practice, Governance, Roles and Professions, Contract Administration, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here