Tampio, K P and Haapasalo, H (2022) Organising methods enabling integration for value creation in complex projects. Construction Innovation, 24(7), pp. 21-43. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify the areas and logic of integration of different stakeholders using different methods and to analyse their applicability and challenges in practical projects. The main aim is to describe how these different methods impact value creation. Design/methodology/approach: Action design research was carried out in a large hospital construction project where the first author acted as an "involved researcher" and the second author acted as an "outside researcher". Two workshops were organised to evaluate the direct and indirect challenges and benefits of the applied four methods and to explain how different methods enable value creation. Findings: All the studied methods provide good results in terms of usability and commitment to the aims of the project, thus delivering the direct benefits expected. Process, people and tools logic works well in this case project when applying the methods properly. Significant evidence was provided on secondary deliverables of the methods, and all analysed methods had a significant impact in the area of leading people, clarifying what "focus on people" means and how it is enabled. Practical implications: Focus on people can be achieved through different operative methods if applied in the right way. It is necessary to select the most suitable methods based on all the direct and indirect deliverables. Originality/value: This case project offered a platform to analyse integration methods in a real-life project using the collaborative contract method. The authors were able to participate in the analysis by taking action from the very beginning of the project in terms of training, learning, continuous development and coaching of these methods and evaluating the applicability.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | ADR; complex projects; integration; lean; methods; ppt; tools; value creation |
| Index terms: | operative, complex project, platform, workshop, evidence, healthcare building construction, value creation, methodology, integration, commitment, usability |
| Subjects: | user-centered design, organizational analysis, practitioner, evaluation and assessment methods, construction type, strategic project management, psychology, digital design, economic development, research methods, building construction |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Project Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here