Ye, Z; Kapogiannis, G; Tang, S; Zhang, Z; Jimenez-Bescos, C and Yang, T (2025) Influence of an integrated value-based asset condition assessment in built asset management. Construction Innovation, 25(2), pp. 248-269. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: Built asset management processes require a long transition period to collect, edit and update asset conditions information from existing data sets. This paper aims to explore and explain whether and how digital technologies, including asset information model (AIM), Internet of Things (IoT) and blockchain, can enhance asset conditions assessment and lead to better asset management. Design/methodology/approach: Mixed methods are applied to achieve the research objective with a focus in universities. The questionnaire aims to test whether the integration of AIM, IoT and blockchain can enhance asset condition assessment (ACA). Descriptive statistical analysis was applied to the quantitative data. The mean, median, mode, standard deviation, variance, skewness and range of the data group were calculated. Semi-structured interviews were designed to answer how the integration of AIM, IoT and blockchain can enhance the ACA. Quantitative data was analysed to define and explain the essential factors for each sub-hypothesis. Meanwhile, to strengthen the evaluation of the research hypothesis, the researcher also obtained secondary data from the literature review. Findings: The research shows that the integration of AIM, IoT and blockchain strongly influences asset conditions assessment. The integration of AIM, IoT and blockchain can improve the asset monitoring and diagnostics through its life cycle and in different aspects, including financial, physical, functional and sustainability. Moreover, the integration of AIM, IoT and blockchain can enhance cross-functional collaboration to avoid misunderstandings, various barriers and enhance trust, communication and collaboration between the team members. Finally, costs and risk could be reduced, and performance could be increased during the ACA. Practical implications: The contribution of this study indicated that the integration of AIM, IoT and blockchain application in asset assessment could increase the efficiency, accuracy, stability and flexibility of asset assessment to ensure the reliability of assets and lead to a high-efficiency working environment. More importantly, a key performance indicator for ACA based on the asset information, technology and people experience could be developed gradually. Originality/value: This study can break the gap between transdisciplinary knowledge to improve the integration of people, technology (AIM, IoT and blockchain) and process value-based ACA in built asset management within universities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | asset condition assessment; asset management; BIM; blockchain; IoT |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, collaboration, methodology, integration, digital technology, built asset management, interview, accuracy, literature review, stability, asset management, monitoring, blockchain, internet, mixed method, key performance indicator, variance, efficiency, secondary data, statistical analysis, deviation, life cycle |
| Subjects: | asset management, research methods, structural engineering, financial and cost management, project delivery, data science, data analysis and analytics, control systems, value management, computing systems, data collection methods, measurement and scaling, organizational analysis, professional development, performance management, management |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Quality Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Site Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here